IMG_1368.jpgIMG_1386.jpgIMG_1370.jpgIMG_1385.jpg
I flew for 1.5 hours on 1/16/20 with the Balance Master installed. The airplane didn't feel as smooth as before, but definitely smoothed out more after full throttle run-up. Today I installed my balancing equipment to get some real numbers. After warm-up, I advanced to 5000 rpm, took a vibration reading, then did the same thing at 4000, 3000 & 2000 rpm. I then went back up in 1000 rpm steps to 5000. I then removed the Balance Master and performed the same exercise again. I had previously dynamically balanced the assembly to 0.02 to 0.03 ips at full-throttle static of approximately 5100 rpm. Here are my results and observations -
With Balance Master - Starting at 5000 rpm - 0.04, 4000 - 0.04, 3000 - 0.12, 2000 - 0.02 Starting at 2000 - 0.03, 3000 - 0.07, 4000 - 0.03, 5000 - 0.10
Without BM - Starting at 5000 rpm - 0.02, 4000 - 0.02, 3000 - 0.01, 2000 - 0.02 Starting at 2000 - 0.02, 3000 - 0.02, 4000 - 0.03, 5000 - 0.03
I allowed time for things to "settle down" before each reading, and observed that with the BM it took a minimum of 30 sec. to 1 min. (sometimes considerably longer) to reach the best balance condition. There was no delay without the BM. I'm not certain why the spike at 5000 rpm when going from 4000 to 5000 with the BM as compared with starting at 5000. Hysteresis in the throttle cable when pushing as opposed to pulling on the throttle arm (I don't have the throttle springs) creating a little carb imbalance may be a factor, but I don't see the same thing without the BM.
So, my experience is smoother operation without the Balance Master, and much smoother during the transition "settling down" periods. I think that the Balance Master would potentially offer a good improvement/option for an out-of-balance condition if dynamic balancing was not easily accomplished, such as when a small "skull-cap" spinner is used on a Rotax. For me, there is no doubt that my situation is better with a good dynamic balance job alone. Your mileage may vary.