Kitfox Aircraft Stick and Rudder Stein Air Grove Aircraft TCW Technologies Dynon Avionics AeroLED MGL Avionics Leading Edge Airfoils Desser EarthX Batteries Garmin G3X Touch

View Poll Results: Did you license your Kitfox, designed for 1550#, at 1320#?

Voters
20. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    8 40.00%
  • No

    12 60.00%
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 27

Thread: 1320 vs 1550

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Senior Member jrevens's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Arvada, CO
    Posts
    2,156

    Default 1320 vs 1550

    I know this has been discussed a lot on this forum previously, but I’m curious about how many builders of the models designed for a max. gross weight of 1550 lbs. have licensed their airplanes at 1320#. I think I know most of the pros & cons, but I’d also be interested in any further comments.
    John Evens
    Arvada, CO
    Kitfox SS7 N27JE
    EAA Lifetime
    Chap. 43 honorary Lifetime

  2. #2
    Senior Member jmodguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    Carmel, IN
    Posts
    744

    Default Re: 1320 vs 1550

    I'll be going 1320.
    Jeff
    KF 5
    340KF

  3. #3
    Senior Member PapuaPilot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Nampa, Idaho
    Posts
    1,227

    Default Re: 1320 vs 1550

    I went with 1550 and plan to keep doing a 3rd class medical. Now we have the Basic Med option. If I want to let my FAA medical expire I can still use my plane at 1550.
    Phil Nelson
    A&P-IA, Maintenance Instructor
    KF 5 Outback, Cont. IO-240
    Flying since 2016

  4. #4
    Senior Member jrevens's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Arvada, CO
    Posts
    2,156

    Default Re: 1320 vs 1550

    When I registered mine I didn’t use the LSA specific application. Is that necessary, or can you just show 1320# max. on your weight & balance calculations?

    I’m leaning towards the same as you Phil, but wonder if I might be making a mistake in my situation.
    John Evens
    Arvada, CO
    Kitfox SS7 N27JE
    EAA Lifetime
    Chap. 43 honorary Lifetime

  5. #5
    Senior Member Flybyjim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Marysville, Pa.
    Posts
    585

    Default Re: 1320 vs 1550

    I am going with 1320 when I register my SS7, I think there will be more buyers at the time this one would be sold down the road at this weight. I have not looked into the legalities of changing the weight at a later time to up the weight. I just sold this past week an Aeronca L16A that I was able to up the weight from 1220 to 1300 due to an installation of some extra brace tubes that were installed at some point in it's past life. I know this one is a certified plane and somewhere there was a 337 for this, maybe one can or can not change the weight on an expermental.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Oak Harbor,Wa
    Posts
    168

    Default Re: 1320 vs 1550

    I do not know if this is correct, however, it is my impression that a builder of experimental amateur built aircraft can use any gross weight up to the design limit of the machine and can change from 1320 to 1550 on a SS7 by calculating a new weight and balance. It might be that the a/c would have to go into a 5 hr phase one flight test test series and have a DAR issue a revised airworthy certificate. ????????????????

  7. #7
    Senior Member jdmcbean's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Homedale, ID
    Posts
    536

    Default Re: 1320 vs 1550

    IMHO.. simply use 1320 on your W&B.. DO NOT use the LSA application. It is still an E-AB. You can always increase gross weight but can not go down and remain eligible to be flown by a Sport Pilot.
    John McBean
    www.kitfoxaircraft.com
    208.337.5111

    "The Sky is not the Limit... It's a Playground"

  8. #8
    Senior Member aviator79's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    Los Alamos, NM
    Posts
    913

    Default Re: 1320 vs 1550

    Quote Originally Posted by neville View Post
    I do not know if this is correct, however, it is my impression that a builder of experimental amateur built aircraft can use any gross weight up to the design limit of the machine and can change from 1320 to 1550 on a SS7 by calculating a new weight and balance. It might be that the a/c would have to go into a 5 hr phase one flight test test series and have a DAR issue a revised airworthy certificate. ????????????????
    This is correct, but it is for all intents and purposes irreversible. You could reduce the weight back to 1320, but the aircraft would no longer meet the definition of LSA and a Sport Pilot would not be able to fly it.

    Possible resale to a Sport Pilot is the only reason to certify at the lower weight. My own thoughts are that since Basic Med, the resale may actually be close to a wash in the market. For every Sport Pilot looking for a plane, there may well be a Private or higher pilot looking for a plane who would prefer to be able to carry more weight.
    --Brian
    Flying - S7SS

  9. #9
    Senior Member Dave S's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    St Paul, MN
    Posts
    1,835

    Default Re: 1320 vs 1550

    Quote Originally Posted by PapuaPilot View Post
    I went with 1550 and plan to keep doing a 3rd class medical. Now we have the Basic Med option. If I want to let my FAA medical expire I can still use my plane at 1550.

    It has been a few years since our S7 got its AW; however, I followed the identical logic Phil did; although the basic med thing was only a gleam in anyone's eye at the time - still doing the Class III at present.

    I do find the 1550 GW a very useful feature.
    Dave S
    Kitfox 7 Trigear (Flying since 2009)
    912ULS Warp Drive

    St Paul, MN

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Gainesville, tx
    Posts
    79

    Default Re: 1320 vs 1550

    lots of people fly at or a "little over" gross. If you know you can safely load more your only worry would be IF you get ramp checked. You would vastly increase your resale eligibility because anyone SP or above could fly it . I have a friend that is in the same predicament but he is a SP currently and legally could not even fly the airplane he is building without more training. At some point you may not be able to keep your medical so having an LSA would come in handy. I know you have a thorp so that may be an issue later.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •