Kitfox Aircraft Stick and Rudder Stein Air Grove Aircraft TCW Technologies Dynon Avionics AeroLED MGL Avionics Leading Edge Airfoils Desser EarthX Batteries Garmin G3X Touch
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: float flying

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    crosslake,mn
    Posts
    13

    Default float flying

    Does anyone know if a MK4 1200 speed wing will work on floats. I know it is shorter than the long wing which generally is the way to go, and can one extend a speed wing?

  2. #2
    Super Moderator Av8r3400's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Merrill, WI
    Posts
    3,044

    Default Re: float flying

    Contact Av8rPS on this list...
    Av8r3400
    Kitfox Model IV
    The Mangy Fox
    912UL 105hp Zipper
    YouTube Videos

  3. #3
    N82HB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Deer Park, WA
    Posts
    115

    Default Re: float flying

    I have a long wing, but I have flown quite a few speedsters, and a lot of experience in a large number of float equipped airplanes.
    I believe it just comes down to performance. If an airplane has excess performance than it will do well on floats.
    In my opinion if you had at least the 80hp 912ul it would do fine. With a 100hp it would be fantastic.
    The problem for me is, What Float? I don't think there is a good float for our size of airplane. Either they are of poor design or the wrong size for our airplanes.
    The little Aerocet straight float is barely enough and as an amphib it is way too small.
    Zenair has some good options, but they start to get expensive. I have experience with the smaller Zenairs on a Kitfox 1 and they did amazing, so I believe their design is good.

    If you find something else that works well let me know. I am looking for reasonable performance for reasonable expense.

    No. I did not forget about Full Lotus. They do not fit my idea of what would make me happy.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Chisholm Mn
    Posts
    1,562

    Default Re: float flying

    The standard length wing on an Avid is the same length as the Kitfox speedwing. Lots of Avids on floats. I have a set of Avid fiberglass floats that I got with a project last summer that I'm not going to be using. I started a thread on them after I got them. Some good info about them in the reply from Paul Seehaufer. Look up - Avid fiberglass floats - in the search feature and you will find the topic. I'm in Mn also. Take care, Jim Chuk
    Last edited by avidflyer; 01-31-2012 at 08:20 AM.

  5. #5
    Senior Member dholly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Clemmons, NC
    Posts
    285

    Default Re: float flying

    In defense of the Aerocets, they were designed for the lighter models with 2-stroke power. My 4-1200 w/912 is a LOT heavier than my KF3 w/ 582 was. I think they make for a very good float on the earlier models and, not great, but a reasonably priced option on a lite 4-1050 or 1200. As you say, what else is there without breaking the bank?
    -Aeropro CZ Aerotrek A240 Tri-Gear SLSA 912uls
    -Airdale Avid+ on CZAW Amphibs 'FatAvid Floater' (building)
    -Kitfox 4-1200 TD 912ul (sold)
    -Kitfox Model III TD 582 (R.I.P.)
    -Avid Flyer Mk-IV TD (sold)

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Rossville, TN
    Posts
    24

    Default Re: float flying

    What's a good amphib float for a Series 5 with 1550 gross? What would a set that'd work go for ... ballpark?
    DAT
    Model V
    912 UL - Xtra
    IVO IFA prop

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    crosslake,mn
    Posts
    13

    Default Re: float flying

    Hey this is some great information I was ready to buy some aerocets which would have been my first choice, now I don't think so. Aparently they don't work well on the mk4 1200 with the 912 Rotax, it would be worse with a Suburu which I believe is more weight plus two people full tanks and a little gear. I'll have to do alot more research, thanks for not letting me make a huge mistake. dan

  8. #8
    Senior Member dholly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Clemmons, NC
    Posts
    285

    Default Re: float flying

    Dan,

    On a KF 4-1200, I would be much more concerned about EA81 engine weight than Aerocet float (straight or amphib) displacement.

    Ie., if the requirement for float certification is that it provide buoyancy of 80% in excess of the maximum gross weight of that seaplane... using 1200 lbs. x 1.8 = 2160 lbs., divided by 2 = 1080 lbs. means you are only ~2% underfloated with an 1100 displacement straight float. Note: that displacement rating is for the straight, not amphib, floats. I have not personally put everything on the scale but Paul (AV8rPS)(see also: KOTM thread) who owned both said he weighed the Aerocet straight floats, rigging and hardware at 158 lbs. and amphibs at 227 lbs. That weight penalty will cost you. I spoke to Paul and three other Aerocet 1100 amphib owners, all on Kitfox 4-1200 w/ 912ul engines. Each said you must be alert at gross as the tips are easy to submerge while slow taxi and turning downwind. However, NONE said they were generally unsafe or planned on taking the amphib floats off. Paul offered comments about his KF 4-1200 amphib on the Avid forum some time ago:

    I have been flying Avid Flyers and kitfoxes since the mid 80's, and
    have accumulated a couple thousand hours of seaplane time in them,
    with a wide variety of engines and airframes. So I hope I can help
    you by sharing what I've learned in the past few decades.

    Currently I am flying a Kitfox IV-1200 on aerocet amphibs. It is very
    well equipped, and weighs 776 lbs on floats (650 on wheels). It is
    powered by a 80 hp Rotax 912ul. (I would expext a 912 Mark IV Avid
    to weigh about 30 lbs less than a Kitfox IV-1200 fwiw). That
    combination makes an awesome seaplane, with performance similar to a
    150 hp Supercub on straight floats. I can get off the water in 6
    seconds solo, and 13-15 seconds dual. Climb rates are 1,000 fpm avg
    solo, and 750 fpm avg dual. Top speed on floats is 124 mph (verified
    numerous times with GPS and by flying next to other planes that
    didn't believe me). Fuel burn averages 3.2 gph at 95-100 mph
    (regular unleaded auto fuel- the 912ul is low compression so doesn't
    need Hi octane fuel). At average fuel burn, I have a very safe 8.5
    hour range. I do utilize an IVO 68" inflight adjustable 3 blade prop,
    which after recent testing against a ground adjustable IVO proved a
    30% reduction in takeoff time on the water, and 5-6 mph in top speed
    (fwiw - a 72" three blade prop would provide even better seaplane
    performance). But if I converted to either the Rotax 100 hp 912s or
    the 115 hp 914 (which both weigh about the same as the 80 hp 912ul),
    I would see significant improvements over my current numbers. Add
    the IVO inflight to those engines and performance would be really
    awesome! So I can tell you without doubt, the 912 Rotax works well on
    these airplanes. Particularly when the airplane is operated as an
    amphibious seaplane. In fact, I've seen a lot of various light sport
    type airplanes with 912's converted to amphibs over the years. But
    I've never seen one that didn't make for a good performing amphib
    seaplane. I think that alone says a lot for using a 912 engine in
    Light sport type aircraft like ours. We know it works.

    Conventional aircraft engines as well as Subarus are just plain too
    heavy for these small airplanes in my opinion. Especially if you
    plan to operate them as seaplanes. A typical Subaru, Lycoming, or
    Continental powered Kitfox IV-1200 will typically weigh over a
    thousand pounds on floats (not necessarily even amphibs). That is
    just too much weight. Not only does the airplane not perform well
    because of all the added weight, but it will also have virtually no
    payload. Comparatively, the lighter 912 amphib will not only
    outperform them, but will also outhaul them. And I'm not just
    guessing this, as I have friends that have flown the Subarus and the
    aircraft engines for years, and I've had a lot of time to compare
    against them.

    Your [Avid] Mark IV will make a marvelous seaplane. But do all you can to
    keep unnecessary weight off of it.
    You can realistically expect your
    amphib floats to add 150-200 lbs to your aircrafts empty weight
    .
    That absolutely kills your payload. So try to calculate your
    estimated empty weight before you get too far along...that will help
    you to resist the temptation of adding luxuries you really don't
    need, or want on a seaplane.

    Just my two cents worth.

    Paul Seehafer
    Wisconsin

    -Aeropro CZ Aerotrek A240 Tri-Gear SLSA 912uls
    -Airdale Avid+ on CZAW Amphibs 'FatAvid Floater' (building)
    -Kitfox 4-1200 TD 912ul (sold)
    -Kitfox Model III TD 582 (R.I.P.)
    -Avid Flyer Mk-IV TD (sold)

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    crosslake,mn
    Posts
    13

    Default Re: float flying

    Well, I'm going to skip buying the kitfox with a subaru that I found, it sounded so nice. I was wondering about the weight issue. Looks like I should keep my sites on the KF 4-1200 with the rotax 912. I wish there were more around for sale. I am greatful for all the advice and help, thanks dan

  10. #10
    Senior Member dholly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Clemmons, NC
    Posts
    285

    Default Re: float flying

    If you're going to float a 4-1200, general consensus says a light frame with 80 or 100 hp 912 is the best configuration possible. Or, if you can tolerate a 2-stroke, you might even consider re-powering a lightweight 4-1200 w/582 with one of the big Rotax 670 90hp motors. At the very least, IMHO, either combo will give you the option to use the Aerocet amphibs. If you take those out of consideration in favor of a higher displacement float, your amphib float options become extremely limited, baggage capacity reduced and your cost to equip skyrockets unless you want to pull several thousand rivets yourself. Unfortunately for you, since that combo also arguably makes for the near perfect KF4 on wheel gear, not too many are given up by their owners voluntarily, last long on the market or fail to command a premium over similarly equipped Sube powered model 4's. BTW, that award-winning 4-1200 w/ Sube FWF listed on BS right now was originally on Aerocet amphib floats, but I see the 2nd owner swapped them out for Full Lotus straight floats. My guess is the heavier nose and overall empty weight simply proved too much for the Aerocets just as Paul said.
    -Aeropro CZ Aerotrek A240 Tri-Gear SLSA 912uls
    -Airdale Avid+ on CZAW Amphibs 'FatAvid Floater' (building)
    -Kitfox 4-1200 TD 912ul (sold)
    -Kitfox Model III TD 582 (R.I.P.)
    -Avid Flyer Mk-IV TD (sold)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •