Kitfox Aircraft Stick and Rudder Stein Air Grove Aircraft TCW Technologies Dynon Avionics AeroLED MGL Avionics Leading Edge Airfoils Desser EarthX Batteries Garmin G3X Touch
Page 1 of 7 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 67

Thread: 912 uls vs Viking HF110

  1. #1
    Senior Member chefwarthog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Nicolet, Quebec, Canada
    Posts
    269

    Default 912 uls vs Viking HF110

    And why not a Honda injection Vikink HF110 instead of a Rotax 912 ULS???
    Go see for your self at @....and let me know.





    http://www.vikingaircraftengines.com/Tech.html

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1bj7P7ZihEc

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    SE Mich
    Posts
    15

    Default Re: 912 uls vs Viking HF110

    The Viking engine looks very interesting to me too. I wonder how well it will fit inside a round cowl. That big radiator might be a problem. I won't buy an engine unless the Mcbeans have engineered a firewall package for it.

    In my search so far, the 912's negative side is the high cost and dual carbs. The Rotec leaks too much oil and there's no liquid for the cabin heat. On the plus side, the Viking has Honda engineering, reliability, liquid cooling, 110 horsepower, and a lower price tag than the other two.

    I keep waiting for John or Debra to call me so I can order my new Super Sport!

    Rex Phelps

  3. #3
    Senior Member chefwarthog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Nicolet, Quebec, Canada
    Posts
    269

    Default Re: 912 uls vs Viking HF110

    What I like from the Vikink, is that it seem neat with no mess of pipe and tubing and no cab heating prob. like the 912

    Not that the Rotax is not a good engine, but it's tag price is the one of the all Honda Fit and I need just the engine.

    If the Kit Fox team make a firewall kit for this engine, I will consider that choice very seriously.

    Look at the pictures......
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Last edited by chefwarthog; 02-12-2011 at 03:03 PM.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    OR
    Posts
    15

    Default Re: 912 uls vs Viking HF110

    That is seriously cool. Everyone knows that Honda 4 cylinder engines are synonymous with performance and reliability, so to see someone get behind this conversion is great. Part availability for the core should be excellent, but all the auxiliary stuff (heater, exhaust, etc) is questionable and dependent on the success of Viking.

    I don't see where the gearbox comes from. Are we to assume it's poached from the marine outboard installation?

  5. #5
    Senior Member chefwarthog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Nicolet, Quebec, Canada
    Posts
    269

    Default Re: 912 uls vs Viking HF110

    The gearboxs is from Viking with a ratio of 2.33:1
    This engine hase the same RPM has the Rotax, with a smaller weigth.


    Honda instal this motor in the formula Ford series racing, and in there outbord marine engine, so that why, this mecanical can sustain a hight RPM


    I found another video that explain more in detail from Sun&Fun 2010...........


    Excuse my english but it make me practise

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cdE33...eature=related

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    ca
    Posts
    167

    Default Re: 912 uls vs Viking HF110

    I'm sure the Honda core is bomb-proof but that's a very small part of the puzzle. Just about every modern Japanese four-banger will run all day because they've had about 60 years of design refinement. I doubt the same can be said of the gear drive on this conversion. It's not like this is the first auto conversion to come down the pike, and I'm sure it won't be the last. I agree the price looks attractive, but there is a reason: no track record. I'll let somebody else put the first 50,000 hours or so on one of these before I jump in.

  7. #7
    Senior Member chefwarthog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Nicolet, Quebec, Canada
    Posts
    269

    Default Re: 912 uls vs Viking HF110

    I don't want to do the Deveil's layer, but did the Wright brother in 1903 did there first flight with an automotive engine in aluninium or not. No, I know what you mean ¨szicree¨ but do the Rotax engine is so much reliable. I know that Vikig is not new to modify automotive engine in to aircraft like the Subaru, does any body as realistic fact on those companies?????

    Thanks, Eric
    Last edited by chefwarthog; 02-13-2011 at 12:22 PM.

  8. #8
    Senior Member Mnflyer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    West Central MN
    Posts
    213

    Default Re: 912 uls vs Viking HF110

    Hi Eric, No the Wright bros did not use an automotive engine, they designed and built their own engine thus it was the very first aircraft engine solely built for aviation. As for the reliability its very easy to see / read / learn about the Rotax 9 series reliability they have flown tens of thousands of hours, the Viking engine may very well be a good engine at sometime but has no flight record as of yet. Just my $.02
    GB
    Flying a HKS Kitfox III and a Champ

  9. #9
    Senior Member chefwarthog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Nicolet, Quebec, Canada
    Posts
    269

    Default Re: 912 uls vs Viking HF110

    In Fact the Wright brother did not disegned there own engine, but they turn to Charles Edward Taylor who build an inline motor from aluminium for the Flyer 1.

    There is no flight record of the HF 110 yet it is a new engine, but have you info on Viking compagnie?
    Last edited by chefwarthog; 02-13-2011 at 01:06 PM.

  10. #10

    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    2

    Default Re: 912 uls vs Viking HF110

    Google "Eggenfellner" and "Eggenfellner engine problems" for more info on the company behind the engine. They have a pretty long and checkered history with Subaru conversions for RVs and Glastars.

    Still, looks intriguing.

    Chris Ross
    Chicago

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •