Kitfox Aircraft Stick and Rudder Stein Air Grove Aircraft TCW Technologies Dynon Avionics AeroLED MGL Avionics Leading Edge Airfoils Desser EarthX Batteries Garmin G3X Touch
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 17

Thread: VG placement

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    AK
    Posts
    62

    Default VG placement

    I have a Model 3 that is about to return to service after a VERY slow engine swap, all that’s for another discussion. I have searched the threads and read everything relating to VGs here but didn’t find a good answer. So, I will be mounting VGs in the near future and I am trying to find a location that works well. I have the STOLspeed kits and have gone to their website that suggests 7% but then references a video which uses 3%. I have seen the 3% (1.25”) used a few times, have found reference to 8-10%, 3.75”, 5”, 8”. Most of the reports here that have solid performance numbers posted don’t go into detail about location, and those that mention specific placement don’t seem to give solid numbers. I may have missed it if it’s there, but can anyone provide a little info with both location and results?

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Location
    Mapleton,UT
    Posts
    1,224

    Default Re: VG placement

    I have not heard of anyone putting them too close, but have heard of many putting them to far back. On the kitfox if you use stolspeed recommendation you will probably not see any improvement. Use 3% and you will be good to go.
    Dustin Dickerson

    Building 7ss STI x 2
    Oratex
    29" shock monster
    EP912STI 155hp
    Garmin
    N33TF......FLYING!
    N53TF......FLYING!

  3. #3
    Senior Member Maverick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    Phoenix
    Posts
    295

    Default Re: VG placement

    I have a series 5 wing. I watched several videos on YouTube (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IYHuXs2F3ds) about it and finally settled on the recommendation of Alex Di Sessa of 35mm back of the leading edge. Not sure it the series 3 wing is similar to a 5. I used StolSpeed VGs also.
    I used the template for locating the leading edge and measured back 35mm from the forward most part of the leading edge and marked it. I then used it to stretch a string the length of the wind. I then used the spacing templates from StolSpeed to get the angles right on the VGs. It made a big difference in stall speeds with power on but only a little with power off. I think that the issue is that the angle of attack on landings isn't steep enough that it affects your landing speed much unless you are using a lot of flap. I don't use flaps.so I can only really tell a difference when I'm practicing stalls. Otherwise, not so much.
    VG1 (3).jpg
    20210724_101156.jpg
    20210724_105346.jpg
    EAA, AOPA
    KF5 (N49FK & N36KJ)
    Phoenix, AZ

  4. #4
    Senior Member Rodney's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Hugo, Oklahoma
    Posts
    226

    Default Re: VG placement

    Would recommend 3% of chord. The testing I have seen on those that put them 8-10% back claim no change to stall speed.
    The reason is the VG's are too far back and have no opportunity to affect the flow over the wing.

    Regards
    Rodney

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    AK
    Posts
    62

    Default Re: VG placement

    Thanks for the responses. I guess I’m just having trouble wrapping my head around 3% and why the Kitfox seems so different. In theory (used loosely) the VG should be where it will accelerate the most energized air into the boundary layer, which should be the highest point in the undisturbed airstream at stall speed. My plane would stall just about in a 3 point attitude, if lucky, but never a higher AOA. So why wouldn’t the VGs be at or near the “top” the wing in a 3 point attitude? 6.5” (or 15%) in my case. My Maule already had VGs installed when I got it, but those are a little in front of the “top” of the wing in a good landing attitude (way tail low). The VGs span from 7% to 9%. 1.3” from the leading edge just seems so far forward…

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Location
    Mapleton,UT
    Posts
    1,224

    Default Re: VG placement

    Not much laminar flow and the airflow separates early on the kitfox. I dropped almost 10 mph on stall speed, while others claim no speed drop when put farther back.
    Dustin Dickerson

    Building 7ss STI x 2
    Oratex
    29" shock monster
    EP912STI 155hp
    Garmin
    N33TF......FLYING!
    N53TF......FLYING!

  7. #7
    Senior Member Rodney's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Hugo, Oklahoma
    Posts
    226

    Default Re: VG placement

    Shadowrider is correct. If you place the VG's too far back, the airflow, more correctly the laminar airflow has all ready separated itself from the wing and the
    VG's are in the disturbed airflow with no chance to do their thing. Go to a STOL competition and look at where the VG's are placed on their wings.

    Regards
    Rodney

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    AK
    Posts
    62

    Default Re: VG placement

    Just to be clear, I’m not discounting any of your information. I’m just trying to get it to make more sense to me. I’m an A&P in Alaska, so almost every plane has VGs, but they’re all certificated so they do what the STC says. I have not been around many STOL specific experimentals so I don’t have that experience to draw from. At least these should be easy enough to move if the results aren't good enough. Thanks again.

  9. #9
    Senior Member rv9ralph's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Greenleaf, ID
    Posts
    618

    Default Re: VG placement

    One more thing to consider in the variables concerning location of VGs. The Model 3 wings (and Models 1&2) are different for the later models. The wing on the Model 3 is undercambered and may affect the location. Another thing that makes the Kitfox different in location the VGs is the flaperon changes most of the calculations. There is a video from 2 guys in South Africa that did a video on their VG placement, it is on a later model wing but the process is interesting... sorry I can't remember their YouTube channel.

    Ralph
    Last edited by rv9ralph; 09-06-2021 at 07:04 PM.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2019
    Location
    Leavenworth WA
    Posts
    613

    Default Re: VG placement

    About2stall I believe are the South African crew and their approach on figuring the placement was pretty good.

    Think this is the link. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IRNPM7A54Yk

    Gary
    Gary (Geek) Phenning
    Leavenworth (Not the Prison), WA
    Kitfox STi in Building Stage

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •