Kitfox Aircraft Stick and Rudder Stein Air Grove Aircraft TCW Technologies Dynon Avionics AeroLED MGL Avionics Leading Edge Airfoils Desser EarthX Batteries Garmin G3X Touch
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16

Thread: Vortex generators

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Clark Fork Idaho
    Posts
    54

    Default Vortex generators

    Have the VG's for my Kitfox 7 and would welcome any members input on install. Assume from the instructions that I should use 3.34 in. between to get 50 per wing. Or... Should they go as far as outboard of flaperon?
    Looks like I can fabricate my own template on paper and then cover with packing tape to stiffen.
    A friend has to fuel with 5 gal. cans and doesn't like having the VG's around the fuel fillers. I don't have that issue as I have a tank with hose in my hangar.
    Hope this isn't too convoluted and will get some sage advice. Jeff in N. Idaho (500hrs on my bird, running great)

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Location
    Mapleton,UT
    Posts
    1,224

    Default Re: Vortex generators

    On the STI wing they made a huge difference. Lowered stall speed 8mph. Breaks harder when stalling, but stalls much slower. I would not go off what the vg instructions say. I went with stol speed vgs. I went 2 inches back from leading edge.
    Dustin Dickerson

    Building 7ss STI x 2
    Oratex
    29" shock monster
    EP912STI 155hp
    Garmin
    N33TF......FLYING!
    N53TF......FLYING!

  3. #3
    Senior Member JoeRuscito's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Location
    Charleston, SC
    Posts
    361

    Default Re: Vortex generators

    Which wing do you have? And do you have the laker leading edge installed? I ask because I have the standard wing and no laker leading edge. I put the vgs as far forward as possible with this setup and while I did see a significant improvement in no flaps and one notch of flaps (4-5 mph). I saw little to no improvement in a full flaps config. Maybe 1 mph if I’m being generous. The laker leading edge I believe would allow a more forward placement and more improvement at the highest angles of attack. In my opinion they are not worth the pia of cleaning and the less predictable stall (more aggressive break).

    That all said I do think the horizontal vgs made a notable improvement.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  4. #4
    mooreaa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    Corvallis, OR
    Posts
    16

    Default Re: Vortex generators

    Jeff if you haven't already, check these two videos out:

    I think these two cover the subject pretty well and provide a lot of insight into where to place them, spacing, etc.

    About2Stall -
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IRNPM7A54Yk

    Bryan Bowen / Project Kitfox -
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vGzHZKRZi7s
    Aaron & Ashley
    Newbie pilots working towards our PPL. Kitfox ordered (OSH19)!
    Corvallis, OR

  5. #5
    N14ND's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Graham, WA
    Posts
    113

    Default Re: Vortex generators

    Here's a couple of other videos on Kitfox VG installation.


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XPC8egjwjY0

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0tBYH1c2ZhQ
    “I wish I knew now as much as I thought I knew when I was 18”

    Building Kitfox 5 (25 yrs and counting)
    0-200
    A&P, ATP

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Sep 2019
    Location
    Tulsa, OK
    Posts
    29

    Default Re: Vortex generators

    Great video's!
    I think I'll pass on the vg's.
    Never really thought about the fact that it would take more correction to break the stall.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Clark Fork Idaho
    Posts
    54

    Default Re: Vortex generators

    After 500 hours on my "7" am getting fairly comfortable on short fields. At my age, gravel bars and waterskiing are out so see no need to rough up my wing with VGs. One knot difference at full flaps is of no consequence, and makes its more difficult to wash. My two cents and thanks to the others helping me make the decision. Jeff, North Idaho

  8. #8
    N14ND's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Graham, WA
    Posts
    113

    Default Re: Vortex generators

    So here’s some chum for the water. For the record, I am not saying that VG’s don’t lower your stall speed and increase the AOA that your wing will fly at. There is a safety factor of a wider AOA and airspeed envelope while “flying”. There is also the argument that VG’s energize the air over the wing and may allow the wing to produce more lift at the normal 3-point landing or takeoff. However, the best way to utilize that increased AOA that VG’s offer and lowered airspeed at touch down is by getting the wing to that higher AOA when the wheels contact the ground. Which means that to takeoff or land at a slower airspeed you need to also increase your “sitting” 3-point attitude. (Or lighten the load that the wings have to lift). My Kitfox sits at roughly 15° AOA. Airframe mods you can do to raise AOA is mount larger tires and/or taller gear. If you’re landing you would need to have the tailwheel lower than the mains at touchdown, which isn’t an unusual occurrence as long as it doesn’t exceed the structural strength of the airframe. Repeated landings like this can cause fatigue failures. I figured it out once for my Kitfox and I think it was one degree increase in AOA for every 3” I raised the bottom of the fuselage with the tailwheel on the ground.
    Keeping the stock wing and current build weight you’d need bush gear, tundra tires 26” or larger to raise sitting AOA to really slow your landing speed. At this angle I think VG’s are probably worth it. I have watched many videos and seen their results on lowered stall speed, but their deck angle is much higher than any landing attitude you want to try. If you were in an emergency and slowing to land in a tree canopy the higher deck angle and slower airspeed would be an advantage. Theoretically, to really test landing speed would be to fly over a lake bed a couple of inches off the ground and slowly decrease speed until all three wheels touched down. Then see what that speed was.

    All that to say that for a normal Kitfox, if you are not going to change your gear set up, VG’s aren’t going to lower your landing speed. You can get slow flight bragging rights, but you’re not going to effectively lower your speed at touchdown. You may feel more confident in your aircrafts performance, which in itself maybe worth the install.
    “I wish I knew now as much as I thought I knew when I was 18”

    Building Kitfox 5 (25 yrs and counting)
    0-200
    A&P, ATP

  9. #9
    Senior Member jmodguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    Carmel, IN
    Posts
    744

    Default Re: Vortex generators

    I went with the “About to Stall” configuration from day 1 so I do not have a no VG baseline. I based my decision on their before and after testing and some research on the shape of airfoils between the ribs. My no flap stall is 45mph with a mild break, and full flap stall is 45mph that just mushes.
    I have the standard wing with no Laker LE. Empty wt is 1013.
    Jeff
    KF 5
    340KF

  10. #10
    Super Moderator desertdave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Location
    Scottsdale AZ
    Posts
    304

    Default Re: Vortex generators

    Quote Originally Posted by jmodguy View Post
    My no flap stall is 45mph with a mild break, and full flap stall is 45mph that just mushes.
    So you have zero difference in performance between clean and full flaps? Your numbers are much greater than my standard wing with no VGs. Something doesn't jive here.
    Dave
    KitFox 6 Taildragger
    912 ULS
    Whirlwind 70” Prop
    Garmin G3x
    All around nice guy

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •