Kitfox Aircraft Stick and Rudder Stein Air Grove Aircraft TCW Technologies Dynon Avionics AeroLED MGL Avionics Leading Edge Airfoils Desser EarthX Batteries Garmin G3X Touch
Results 1 to 10 of 20

Thread: Landing gear weight

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Corona, CA
    Posts
    16

    Default Re: Landing gear weight

    Not going to get into the landing gear preference or wheel sizes but do you really need a 914? Had 914 that happened to be more problematic then I cared for. Fortunately I found a 912uls (salvaged motor/ totally rebuilt) and put the zipper big bore 1484cc kit and I’m very happy. Flown into the Sierra mountain and happy with motor. I need to add that the engine is a later 2007 model with thru bolt cases and the cam was replaced with the zipper big bore high performance cam.
    Kitfox 7 flying

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Boise, ID
    Posts
    249

    Default Re: Landing gear weight

    Quote Originally Posted by michaega View Post
    Not going to get into the landing gear preference or wheel sizes but do you really need a 914? Had 914 that happened to be more problematic then I cared for. Fortunately I found a 912uls (salvaged motor/ totally rebuilt) and put the zipper big bore 1484cc kit and I’m very happy. Flown into the Sierra mountain and happy with motor. I need to add that the engine is a later 2007 model with thru bolt cases and the cam was replaced with the zipper big bore high performance cam.
    What’s the HP now?

  3. #3

    Default Re: Landing gear weight

    I think there is a great argument for the Shock monster gear, but it is a trade off with cruise speed for sure, you will loose 7-10 mph depending on tires. The gear is far safer and can make a bad grove gear landing look good. It allows for a greater angle of attack on take off and landing because of the higher stance, but hurts the visibility out the front. The TK1 gear legs move the wheels forward a couple inches which really improves the ground handling making it very stable.

    The TK1 gear legs and Shock monster shocks are 1.6 lbs lighter than the Grove spring gear. You can shave an additional 4.12 lbs off by using the Beringer wheels and brakes. If you are interested in the Airstreaks in a 26" but plan on using the Kitfox at the LSA gross weight of 1320 lbs than look at the Alaskan Bushwheel Ultralights, the 26" is 3.5 lbs lighter per tire than the Airstreaks. the 29" Ultralight is 6lbs lighter per tire than the Airstreak 29."

    Just some ways to save weight.
    Bryan
    Project Kitfox
    Bowen Aero LLC
    Kitfox Model 5 Lycoming O-290 D powered
    Building a Model 7 Apex powered
    Redding, CA
    http://www.youtube.com/c/ProjectKitfox

  4. #4
    Super Moderator Av8r3400's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Merrill, WI
    Posts
    3,048

    Default Re: Landing gear weight

    When I converted my old model IV-1050 from Bungee gear, ATV tires with Douglass wheels and Matco brakes to Grove Gear, wheels, brakes and 21-800/6 tires the net weight gain was:


    12 pounds.
    Av8r3400
    Kitfox Model IV
    The Mangy Fox
    912UL 105hp Zipper
    YouTube Videos

  5. #5

    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Torrington, wy
    Posts
    8

    Default Re: Landing gear weight

    Quote Originally Posted by redbowen View Post
    I think there is a great argument for the Shock monster gear, but it is a trade off with cruise speed for sure, you will loose 7-10 mph depending on tires. The gear is far safer and can make a bad grove gear landing look good. It allows for a greater angle of attack on take off and landing because of the higher stance, but hurts the visibility out the front. The TK1 gear legs move the wheels forward a couple inches which really improves the ground handling making it very stable.

    The TK1 gear legs and Shock monster shocks are 1.6 lbs lighter than the Grove spring gear. You can shave an additional 4.12 lbs off by using the Beringer wheels and brakes. If you are interested in the Airstreaks in a 26" but plan on using the Kitfox at the LSA gross weight of 1320 lbs than look at the Alaskan Bushwheel Ultralights, the 26" is 3.5 lbs lighter per tire than the Airstreaks. the 29" Ultralight is 6lbs lighter per tire than the Airstreak 29."

    Just some ways to save weight.
    Not to derail but doesn’t moving the gear further from the CG make the plane less stable?

  6. #6

    Default Re: Landing gear weight

    Quote Originally Posted by 72chevy View Post
    Not to derail but doesn’t moving the gear further from the CG make the plane less stable?
    It does move the CG aft on the ground which puts more weight on the tail, for ground handling this helps, it also allows for much more aggressive braking. In flight it does move the CG very slightly forward. It is very close to the datum so it doesn't have a noticeable effect. I was skeptical but it really does handle much better.
    Bryan
    Project Kitfox
    Bowen Aero LLC
    Kitfox Model 5 Lycoming O-290 D powered
    Building a Model 7 Apex powered
    Redding, CA
    http://www.youtube.com/c/ProjectKitfox

  7. #7
    Senior Member Esser's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Edmonton, AB
    Posts
    2,048

    Default Re: Landing gear weight

    More weight behind your main wheels in theory should make the plane less stable with ground handling as the weight wants to swap ends. This is why tail draggers ground loop. The weight tries to swap ends. The more weight aft, the worse it it. I understand what you are saying about a longer coupled wheel base which does make the plane more stable. It's be interesting to find out where the sweet spot is.
    ------------------
    Josh Esser
    Flying SS7
    Rotax 914iS
    AirMaster Prop

    Edmonton, AB, CWL3

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •