Kitfox Aircraft Stick and Rudder Stein Air Grove Aircraft TCW Technologies Dynon Avionics AeroLED MGL Avionics Leading Edge Airfoils Desser EarthX Batteries Garmin G3X Touch
Page 1 of 8 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 71

Thread: A much faster Kitfox?

  1. #1
    Senior Member av8rps's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Junction City, WI
    Posts
    680

    Default A much faster Kitfox?

    I often wondered if we were to really clean up (aerodynamically to reduce the drag of) our Kitfoxes, how fast and efficient might they really be? I'm convinced they have a lot more potential for speed than most think they do.

    So I think it might be worthwhile for our group here to discuss ideas on this subject.

    Now, I know that there are those out there that have already done an amazing job cleaning up their Kitfoxes. But I'm advocating going beyond the norm by adding aerodynamic fairings like these; (as an example)

    - The outer wing strut connection to the wing, covering up the rod ends. I've always thought something like they used on Monocoupes and air racers could be used, and yet still be easily removed for inspections?

    - Really nice deep jury strut fairings (that meet the 4.25:1 ratio). Kitfox built them for the M4 Speedster, but they weren't very deep, and we haven't seen them since (as far as I know).

    - A nice fairing for the horizontal stabilizer strut rod ends and where the strut intersects the fuselage. Kitfox built steamlined struts for the Horizontal, but never for the attach areas.

    - A fairing for the lower wing strut to fuselage attachment. But this one would have to be easily removed for wing folding.

    - A fairing for the landing gear attach area on the fuselage. This one would likely have to be flexible so it can allow gear movement.

    - A custom fairing that would clean up the area under the butt rib / top of door area, and would extend to the bottom side of the turtledeck, cleaning up the area where the flaperon tube comes out as well as the bottom of the wing root. By filling that area in we would also be able to keep our cabins warmer in the winter.

    I know that many will think this is overkill for a Kitfox since it is generally viewed more as a fun backyard STOL aircraft than as a cruiser. But let's face it, ever since the new Riblett wing was put on the Kitfox, with the right power plant and prop our little backyard STOL planes make pretty reasonable cruisers. But I'm convinced they could be a lot faster with the right aerodynamic improvements...

    Plus, in addition to the improved speed there are other benefits we will get from more aerodynamic "clean up":

    * Less drag also provides a better climb rate on the same thrust
    * Less drag requires less fuel, less horsepower / thrust
    * Less drag, less fuel, also makes for better range (you can pull power back and yet go same speed as before)
    * Less drag means you can get places more effectively, flying faster on the available horsepower (e.g.; Dealing with headwinds)
    * Less drag can also equate into more safety. Being able to go around the bad weather when needed (I'm not advocating flying in bad weather, but if you find yourself in that predicament you have more options...)

    Now don't get me wrong, as I know our Kitfoxes are already a great combination of back country abilities while also being able to cruise. There really aren't many aircraft that can do both so well on such little power and fuel. But because I happen to own a really fast little 80 hp Model 4 (WOT= 125 mph on amphib floats no less!), it makes me realize that with a few more aerodynamic improvements, it has a lot of potential to be an even more AWESOME aircraft.

    I know the current trend is towards more back country abilities. But for the average guy, our Kitfoxes are already pretty good in that realm. Getting places faster I believe is more important, and more practical to more people. And heck, if we could just prove these clean up ideas to be effective, and the parts could be made cost effectively, Kitfox probably couldn't make airplanes fast enough. (although that might already be the case?)

    Why am I not doing it? Simple, too much going on. So I thought I'd share this with the group to see if someone wants to try doing some of these ideas to prove them out.

    Now, if I were doing it, I wouldn't make it a huge ordeal by making complex molds and forms, etc. Rather I would just obtain some of the material they use to make casts in the medical world (plastic that can be formed with heat?) and then tape them onto the plane, one at a time until I got all of them on it. And as I added them, I'd try to verify the results of each fairing until I came up with a final total MPH increase number. I doubt any one area will make for a huge change, rather it is likely that the combination of all the areas will give us the increase we desire. In other words, there's no magic bullet for gaining speed. Rather, it is a combination of little things that are likely to improve speed.

    And sure, this could be just a brain fart I am having that proves to be a big waste of time? But I really don't think it would be, as everytime I put the nose down on my Kitfox with the new wing, I'm reminded that unlike the Kitfoxes of past, it isn't the wing that is holding us back from going faster. So if we could now just make the rest of the airframe as efficient as the wing is, we are bound to go faster.
    Last edited by av8rps; 10-13-2014 at 06:56 PM.

  2. #2
    Senior Member Peteohms's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Leander, TX Hangared @ KGTU
    Posts
    272

    Default Re: A much faster Kitfox?

    Wouldn't that cause you to easily exceed VNE? Maybe over stress the airplane? Just a thought.

    I was discussing making some streamline changes to a plane with the designer. He said the plane was draggy to prevent over speed. Wasn't a Kitfox, but same argument might apply.
    Pete
    Leander, TX
    Model III SN 1000
    912
    Grove

  3. #3
    Administrator DesertFox4's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    3,563

    Default Re: A much faster Kitfox?

    Paul, a couple of the items on your Kitfox speed mods. wish list have been done.

    The strut to wing attach points for instance. Murle Williams had them on his Model 5 years ago. I have had a set of the same plastic fairings sitting in my hangar since before I first flew my Model 4 back in 2003. I just never painted them and installed them. They do look nice though.

    Also the landing gear (Grove) have been faired into the fuselage on a couple Arizona Kitfoxs going back to Murle Williams 1997 model 5 Grand Champion. Phil Laker I think did that mod to his Vixen also.

    All those mods should be effective for increasing speed. We just don't know exactly how effective. It would add build time to the aircraft but for some that isn't a concern. Weight has to be factored in also but most of the mods you mentioned can be, and some have been done, with careful attention to minimizing weight gain.

    It is always nice to pick up a few mph to your cruise speed and or reduce your power setting and leave more fuel in your tanks for the same cruise speeds.


    DesertFox4
    Admin.
    7 Super Sport
    912 ULS Tri-gear


  4. #4
    Senior Member av8rps's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Junction City, WI
    Posts
    680

    Default Re: A much faster Kitfox?

    Hi Pete,

    I agree that we need to always be aware of not exceeding VNE. And I also agree that we need to not go nuts on this speed stuff. And that we need to respect design limits. But I just recently was flying with a friend in his multi million dollar Pilatus PC-12, and the whole time we flew he was working to stay under the VNE, as he could exceed it easily if he wasn't careful.

    For me, I only wish I could fly my Kitfox having to worry about trying to stay under the the VNE constantly. Just imagine how efficient that would make our planes? If the Super Sport as an example could do that, Kitfox would be the talk of the town. I'm not sure, but I think that's the reason people buy the planes like the RV-12. I've heard it can cruise easily at the max LSA of 120 knots. Same goes for the others like the CT. So why can't the Kitfox join those ranks? It's already close. And actually, I'm thinking the Kitfox is probably stronger than those other airframes.

    I think a more critical concern would be keeping under our maneuvering speed limit, as even with floats on my plane I do have to watch that number. But hey, I don't mind that at all, as that number on my plane is faster than most of the competition can cruise at (on floats).

    I suppose its possible that the airframe design could be intentionally draggy to force staying within VNE? But if so then I'd be confused as to why they went to the Riblett airfoil, as that airfoil changed everything about the airplane. We went from that slow little backyard flyer to a 130+ mph Speester, that did a regular aerobatic demonstration at air shows all across America. And if any one thing sold the plane back then, it was the simple fact that not only was the airplane versatile enough to do just about any role an owner could want, but it also had a reasonably fast cruise speed to get you from place to place.

    And as I recall, Kitfox sold a whole bunch of planes in those years.

    But again, I agree with being extra careful with too much speed. So your point is well taken.




    Quote Originally Posted by Peteohms View Post
    Wouldn't that cause you to easily exceed VNE? Maybe over stress the airplane? Just a thought.

    I was discussing making some streamline changes to a plane with the designer. He said the plane was draggy to prevent over speed. Wasn't a Kitfox, but same argument might apply.

  5. #5
    Senior Member av8rps's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Junction City, WI
    Posts
    680

    Default Re: A much faster Kitfox?

    Yes, I remember Murle doing some of those mods. And I can't say I know this factually, but I've always heard that not only were Murle's Kitfoxes beautiful, but they were also light weight, and fast. So when I was thinking about what I initially wrote, I was thinking alot about what Murle has done over the years.

    However, using the wing strut fairings he made as an example, while lightweight and very simple, I believe they could be made much more effective if we just studied some older airplanes.

    My mentor at EAA's Oshkosh Seaplane Base is Bill Brennand, who I've come to know very well now for over a decade. Bill not only founded that Seaplane Base, but also was a world class winning air racer, and Steve Wittmans right hand guy (Bill and Steve's original air racer "Buster" hangs in the Smithsonian today). So he knows a thing or two about making an airplane go fast. One day with my Kitfox in front of us, I asked Bill about a bunch of my ideas about how to make a Kitfox fly faster.

    In Bill's normal fashion, he was quiet for a long time, and then responded by saying "Just look at what we did back then to our racers. We didn't always have the option for more power, so we typically used small engines with low drag airframes. So if you look at what guys like Wittman did, you'll find all your answers." Then he went on to say he was surprised that as popular as the Kitfox was that anyone hasn't already done that. He laughed a bit while half joking "If Wittman would've owned one, it would've probably been 40 or 50 miles an hour faster with the same engine".

    So I've been studying all that ever since he told me all that. And I've concluded that while any fairing is probably better than no fairing, the superior fairing ideas are likely to surprise people with their amazing results. But again, there is no one magic bullet for speed. It is a combination of effective airframe cleanups as well as lightening techniques. Heck, just look at what wing strut fairings do for our faster models (10-12 mph is pretty common).

    On an entertaining note about Bill, one day he told me to look at one of his old air race photos that was taken right after a race he'd won. Prior to the race Wittman had decided that to save weight they were going to make the side glass out of aluminum rather than a heavier transluscent material. Bill admitted he could see almost nothing to his side, describing it like a race horse with blinders on. But ultimately, he won the race . He said the only time that caused him real concern about not having side visibility was when he was in that little 15 ft winged racer during the qualifying laps and the prop disintegrated in flight, forcing him to land between a bunch of automobiles and people in a busy parking lot . He said it was uneventful, and they still qualified for the race the same day, and won. Wittman of course proved his point that every clean up one can do, and every ounce of weight savings, can be the difference between winning and losing.

    But Bill chuckled with his final statement, shrugging his shoulders and saying "But he didn't have to fly the airplane... I did".

    Based on all the things Bill has taught me over the years, I feel like I still have a lot I need to know

    Quote Originally Posted by DesertFox4 View Post
    Paul, a couple of the items on your Kitfox speed mods. wish list have been done.

    The strut to wing attach points for instance. Murle Williams had them on his Model 5 years ago. I have had a set of the same plastic fairings sitting in my hangar since before I first flew my Model 4 back in 2003. I just never painted them and installed them. They do look nice though.

    Also the landing gear (Grove) have been faired into the fuselage on a couple Arizona Kitfoxs going back to Murle Williams 1997 model 5 Grand Champion. Phil Laker I think did that mod to his Vixen also.

    All those mods should be effective for increasing speed. We just don't know exactly how effective. It would add build time to the aircraft but for some that isn't a concern. Weight has to be factored in also but most of the mods you mentioned can be, and some have been done, with careful attention to minimizing weight gain.

    It is always nice to pick up a few mph to your cruise speed and or reduce your power setting and leave more fuel in your tanks for the same cruise speeds.
    Last edited by av8rps; 10-13-2014 at 07:02 PM.

  6. #6
    Senior Member HighWing's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Goodyear, AZ
    Posts
    1,743

    Default Re: A much faster Kitfox?

    I find this thread very interesting. Paul's thoughts seem to pretty much parallel mine since the beginning. My current Model IV has the 912UL just like my first one. I put a lot of fairings on that one and the biggest thing I noticed was the fuel burn when on our occasional flights of six to eight. We always flew as a group so the cleaner airplanes would fly at lower engine speeds resulting in some interesting observations at fueling times. Once on a three hour flight on our way to Idaho the range at Winnemucca for fuel in our flight of six was a tad over 7 gallons to a tad over 12 gallons. I have put the same fairings on the new one largely because I like the simplicity of the UL and hoped to keep up with the ULS guys.

    I would also agree that climb at clean is better than climb at dirty.

    In the other thread about 7SS's empty weights I couldn't keep from thinking about what we like on our airplanes. Mine is heavier than a typical IV, but I tried to make the added weight a functional addition rather than just a look good addition, though I think they look good.

    I have done several of the mods Paul suggests.. I added a little over six pounds to the empennage with full airfoiled horizontal and vertical surfaces with gap seals and the strut fairings. Also the over the horizontal fuselage gap closure. I am embarrassed to say, however, that I haven't done enough flying to really report on the benefits.

    Just today, I was looking at the 21" tires and thinking what I would need to mount the aft wheel fairings like those used on the Ercoupe. I've thought about that one for years

    Helping my buddy on his Lancair IV taught me some interesting tricks working with fiberglass. Most of these fairing mods can be done over a finished airplane. More on the tricks later. A couple of pictures for now.
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Lowell Fitt
    Goodyear, AZ


    My You Tube Channel

  7. #7
    kitfox5v's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Winnsboro SC
    Posts
    75

    Default Re: A much faster Kitfox?

    Lowell,
    You need to add this to your list of toys on HW LLC. I would like to put those on my 4. I've got the ones kitfox sells but the longer teardrop will create less drag.
    How did you make the seals for the farings? What are they made of? Thanks
    Hope you had a great birthday. Eddie
    Flying a series 4 speedster
    Rotax 912uls whirlwind 75”

  8. #8
    Senior Member av8rps's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Junction City, WI
    Posts
    680

    Default Re: A much faster Kitfox?

    Lowell,

    That is exactly what I was talking about! I had no idea anyone was doing it to the extent you are. I also think your results from trips with similar aircraft, faired and unfaired, with varying fuel burns proves this is worth doing to our airplanes.

    Paul
    Last edited by av8rps; 10-13-2014 at 07:08 PM.

  9. #9
    Senior Member HighWing's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Goodyear, AZ
    Posts
    1,743

    Default Re: A much faster Kitfox?

    Eddie,
    I've thought about kitting the parts, but most have to be custom fit. Example - the ribs I used in the horizontal tail are patterned somewhat after the ribs in the speedster tail, but not exactly. The fairings on the struts fit the profile of my horizontal stabilizer and won't fit anyone elses

    Below are some photos of the Horizontal stabilizer strut and jury strut fairing tools and procedures.

    1 The fairing tooling and a couple of glass fairing pieces. The tool was made by gluing a couple of pieces of balsa of the appropriate width to a strip of thin aluminum. It is then sanded to shape and covered with a single layer of light weight glass - see below for the method. It is then sanded and primed and sanded smooth. One of the fairing pieces is glued at the trailing edge and one is still open. The airfoiled foam piece for fitting to the tubing can simply be press cut using the end of the fairing piece. The fairing section on the right is 20-1/2" long and weighs 1.005 oz.
    Fairing Form.jpg


    2. One of the Lancair techniques. A single layer of glass cloth is laid down on a piece of vinyl sheeting and the resin is added to the cloth. After it is saturated a sheet of thin Polyfiber or other Dacron covering fabric is laid on top of the glass.
    Fairing Pour.jpg



    3. another sheet of vinyl is placed on the top of the glass strip and excess resin is squeegeed out.
    Fairing Squeegee.jpg


    4. The bottom layer of vinyl is removed and the glass is laid out on the form - previously treated with a mold release - and all air bubbles are removed by finger pressure. The top layer of vinyl is then removed and it is rechecked for bubbles.
    Fairing Bubbles.jpg


    5. The clamp - couldn't find it for a separate photo - is placed to hold the glass - Dacron sandwich so it wont lift up at what will be the trailing edge and secured with a couple of spring clamps. The clamp is made from a length of piano hinge with aluminum angles riveted to the free edges forming a sort of a long clamshell clamp.
    Fairing Clamped.jpg

    6. The finished fairing is trimmed slowly with a table saw
    Fairing trim.jpg
    Lowell Fitt
    Goodyear, AZ


    My You Tube Channel

  10. #10
    SWeidemann's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Madison, WI
    Posts
    159

    Default Re: A much faster Kitfox?

    Kitfox Folks,

    My Vixen may be one of those Arizona airplanes you are referring to. It has a built up bunch of wood framework & stringers starting just aft the firewall, running to a channel for flush mounting the spring gear, and continuing aft & tapering back into the bottom longerons a ways back. The smooth fabric on the bottom I am certain adds some speed. I get about 120 mph with a 912 ULS. I've also got my mind on some streamlined horiz strut fairings, wing strut/ fuselage fairings & wing strut-to-wing fairings. I already have a set of gas cap fairings to install.

    "Also the landing gear (Grove) have been faired into the fuselage on a couple Arizona Kitfoxs going back to Murle Williams 1997 model 5 Grand Champion. Phil Laker I think did that mod to his Vixen also."

    Skot
    Kitfox Vixen 912 ULS
    N24V at C29

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •