Kitfox Aircraft Stick and Rudder Stein Air Grove Aircraft TCW Technologies Dynon Avionics AeroLED MGL Avionics Leading Edge Airfoils Desser EarthX Batteries Garmin G3X Touch
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 19 of 19

Thread: Looks like I get to fly a IV- any tips??

  1. #11

    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    Central OR
    Posts
    11

    Default Re: Looks like I get to fly a IV- any tips??

    Thanks again for the feedback, all. Those EAA videos were quite informative. I think I'm more intimidated by the engine management now than anything! It all seems pretty familiar though- I flew twin-Cessnas for a couple years with geared Continental engines (GTSIO-520s in Cessna 421 pressurized twins). I do remember that one of the big no-nos was letting relative airflow "drive" the motors, as opposed to keeping enough power in so that the motors were always pulling the airplane. Seems like sort of the same thing. Of course, many GA airplanes had issues with shock cooling also that required a certain amount of engine management as well.

    I did find out that this IV I'm planning to fly next week does have both Grove landing gear and a pneumatic tailwheel. Sounds like those should both be helpful modifications...

  2. #12
    Senior Member av8rps's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Junction City, WI
    Posts
    680

    Default Re: Looks like I get to fly a IV- any tips??

    I have 1300 hours behind 2 strokes mostly in Avid Flyers (predecessor to the Kitfox and similar in handling), but also in a Kitfox IV-1050 with a 582. I enjoyed my time behind 2 strokes - they are simple engines that make lots of power per pound, and if on a light airplane can provide incredible performance. But unfortunately, the 2 strokes aren't known for being as reliable as most 4 strokes. And not that any aircraft engine on any plane can't quit at any time (I've had 2 Lycomings in certified aircraft fail me), but just be aware there could be a higher potential for an emergency landing with the 2 stroke. Fortuntely, if you were to have an engine failure in an airplane, a Kitfox is a great one to have it in as it is so capable you can land it in a really tight space if you need to.

    I own a Model IV Kitfox and love it. As far as flying one I agree that they are light on controls and somewhat sensitive, which in my opinion is a big part of what makes them so much fun. The best word I can use to describe these airplanes is... "Nimble". They are not hard to fly at all in my opinion, but they also aren't a Cub. They are shorter coupled and have a much higher horsepower to weight ratio than a Cub, making them a lot more high performance and much quicker reacting. But when I say quick reacting I mean that in a good way.

    I once taught a flight instructor (who flew a Cub typically) how to fly a 2 stroke Avid Mark IV (again, similar to a Model IV Kitfox). Once he adjusted to it (approx 45 minutes) he really liked it, commenting that it was a lot sportier feeling and nimble than the Cub. He did initially find the adverse yaw to be a bit different than most planes he flew. But the Kitfox IV has less adverse yaw than the Avid does so I'm guessing had he been in a Kitfox IV he probably wouldn't have noticed that quite as much.

    I agree with the previous comments about Maule tailwheels. That tailwheel has probably wrecked more Kitfoxes and Avids than any other single thing. It also probably has done the most damage to the reputation of these fine little airplanes than any other thing. But as long as the tailwheel is working properly, they have nice ground handling characteristics, and anyone that can fly a Cub can fly a Kitfox. At least that's my opinion.

    For speeds I recommend flying a 65 mph climb, and at least a 60 mph approach, bleeding off any excess speed in the flare. Yes, you might experience some float at that speed, but you can always experiment with slower speeds that allow you to land shorter once you get more hours under your belt. The Kitfox is a STOL airplane, and like most STOL airplanes it can develop a lot of drag when you slow it down, causing a very high sink rate in a short time. So a lot of people have dropped these airplanes in hard enough to damage them, and their pride.

    I say all that after having been flying these types of airplanes since 1986, and pretty much every model and engine combination. I've seen a lot of them get wrecked over the years, and 2nd to the Maule tailwheel problems, people getting them too slow in the landing is what I believe is the primary mistake newcomers make with the airplane. Yes, the Kitfox IV stalls much slower than 60 mph. But unless you are able to recognize the need to use inertia and/or power to offset the excessive sink rate that can quickly develop at speeds closer to the stall speed, you might find yourself in a situation you'd rather not be in.

    On a last note, that 60+ mph approach recommendation is the same number I recommend for an engine off glide speed. Get slower than that and you will not only develop a really high sink rate, but you will also not have enough elevator authority to flare. That could ruin an otherwise good day... Granted, not every Kitfox is the same...some can fly slower than others. And some airspeed indicators have more error than others. But as a general rule, 60 mph is a good number to remember when flying these airplanes.

    My two cents worth...

    Paul Seehafer

  3. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Brownsburg, IN
    Posts
    544

    Default Re: Looks like I get to fly a IV- any tips??

    Holy Crap guys! You all have me second guessing my decision to get back into flying. I thought this plane would be close to what I was used to. I learned how to fly in a Piper Vagabond (little brother to the Cub), then Dad bought a Baby Great Lakes. Both would keep you busy on the rudder pedals. The Lakes did have a true locking tail wheel. It needed one! All I've ever flow had a tail wheel. But you guys have me worried now.
    Jay

  4. #14
    Senior Member av8rps's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Junction City, WI
    Posts
    680

    Default Re: Looks like I get to fly a IV- any tips??

    Jay,

    Unless there is something wrong with the Kitfox (or particularly with the tailwheel), with the experience in the Vag and the Lakes, I doubt you would have any trouble with the Kitfox.

    And if you want to alleviate any potential issues with a Maule tailwheel, just remove the screw on the back side of the tailwheel casting that holds a cam plate/bracket, and set the bracket in the hangar somewhere, then go out and enjoy the Kitfox. The only thing removing the bracket will do is not allow the tailwheel to swivel 360 degrees. But it will still turn with the rudder left and right. Removing that plate is cheap insurance if you have any concerns about a Maule tailwheel swiveling when you don't want it to.

    Don't let any of this scare you off. Kitfox are great flying airplanes.

    Paul

  5. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Garland, Texas
    Posts
    1,476

    Default Re: Looks like I get to fly a IV- any tips??

    I'll second the comment Kitfoxes are great flying airplanes.
    Paul Zimmermann
    LSRM-A
    Garland, Texas

  6. #16

    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    Central OR
    Posts
    11

    Default Re: Looks like I get to fly a IV- any tips??

    UPDATE-

    First, I have a bit more info on the airplane than I knew when I started this thread. It's a IV-1200, with a non-blue head 582 on it and a non-adjustable 3-blade prop. Empty weight (from what I can find) is about 640. The gear is Grove (I mentioned that earlier) and it has a brand-new Matco single-arm pneumatic tailwheel (doesn't seem to be "locking" type- no detent either).

    Question- when you guys mentioned "locking" type tailwheels earlier, were you referring to the type with a detent that keeps it relatively straight up to a certain amount of resistance, and then breaks free and allows the tailwheel to caster further (such as Scott- fairly common on production-built taildraggers)? I'm thinking now that's possibly what was alluded to earlier in the thread. It threw me for a loop (figuratively) because from my experience a locking tailwheel actually has a handle in the cockpit and a cable running all the way to the tailwheel, and you lock it straight for takeoffs and landings. I flew a Gull-wing Stinson (Reliant- BIG airplane with a feeble 300-hp Lycoming radial) from Virginia to Arizona once, and it had such a tailwheel setup. Just trying to clarify which type of "locking" tailwheel we were discussing.

    So, I went to the airport yesterday with hopes of getting that flight in. Unfortunately, things didn't work out with the other gentleman's schedule, etc., and we weren't able to fly it yet. And now, darnit, I have to go to work next week for about 10 days. Bummer!

    Anyhow, hopefully in a few weeks things will mesh better and I'll get to fly this thing. I did start it up and taxi around some. It's small! Fortunately, I'm not a real big guy at 5 9 and 170. Suffice it to say I'm excited to get to fly it one of these days, and hoping that it will lead to the CFO's approval for me to get one of my own, lol.

  7. #17
    Senior Member t j's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Ellensburg, WA
    Posts
    861

    Default Re: Looks like I get to fly a IV- any tips??

    Question- when you guys mentioned "locking" type tailwheels earlier, were you referring to the type with a detent that keeps it relatively straight up to a certain amount of resistance, and then breaks free and allows the tailwheel to caster further (such as Scott- fairly common on production-built taildraggers)?
    Yes. The model 4 kits all came with a Maul tailwheel. Many on this site do not like the "Unlocking" feature. I like mine.
    Tom Jones
    Classic 4 builder

  8. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Brownsburg, IN
    Posts
    544

    Default Re: Looks like I get to fly a IV- any tips??

    I would call mine a semi-locking type. It will only release when the rudder has full deflection. Both the Vagabond and Clipper dad owned were like this as well. This is a bit of a pain when the wings are folded back on my Kitfox as the rudder will not go full travel. So the tailwheel will not release unless you crawl under and manually trigger the locking catch. So made a dolly for not only the tail, but the mains as well. I can now spin or move the aircraft sideways in the barn. Very handy!

    Now dad's Baby Great Lakes had a manual locking tail wheel. And it needed one! Google a photo and you will see the ultimate in short coupled tail dragger! Anyway, it had a cable release in the cockpit. It sat so nose high that you couldn't see straight ahead on the ground. You had to "S" taxi like a WWII fighter!
    Jay

  9. #19
    Senior Member av8rps's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Junction City, WI
    Posts
    680

    Default Re: Looks like I get to fly a IV- any tips??

    The Maule tailwheel we talked about is not a locking tailwheel (as in one that you can lock so it stays straight). What we meant is that it moves left and right with rudder movement, but has the ability to "unlock" by locking a brake, allowing it to swivel up to 360 degrees for turning the aircraft in its own radius on the ground, or is used to push the aircraft backwards into a hangar. The problem with the Maule tailwheel is that ON SOME AIRCRAFT the full swivel feature will engage in flight from full rudder deflection (it shouldnt go full swivel in the air, only on the ground), and the tailwheel can then move left or right (typically 90 degrees) so as soon as the tailwheel touches the ground you are in a super hard right or left 90 degree turn, which ultimarely results in a abrupt and severe groundloop.

    With all that said, if the Kitfox has a Matco tailwheel on it (vs a Maule), it is highly unlikely you will have any ground handling issues associated with the tailwheel.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •